Defense Business Buzz: Contracts, Policy Shifts, and a Push for Innovation

Navigating Key Investments, Strategic Directives, and Industry Transformation

Defense Business Buzz: Contracts, Policy Shifts, and a Push for Innovation

The defense sector is abuzz with activity this week, marked by significant contract awards, evolving policy directives, and a strong emphasis on strengthening the industrial base. From multi-million dollar grants for advanced manufacturing to renewed debates over weapons shipments, the landscape remains dynamic and critically important to national security.

---

Key Developments in Defense Business

Major Investments and Manufacturing Expansion:

A standout development this week is the substantial investment in Anduril Industries' "Arsenal 1" manufacturing facility in Ohio. The company secured a $310 million grant from JobsOhio to build a massive advanced manufacturing plant near Columbus. This facility, expected to create over 4,000 jobs, will be dedicated to producing military drones and autonomous air vehicles. This move underscores a broader trend towards onshore defense production and a focus on cutting-edge autonomous systems.

Beyond Anduril, there's ongoing significant contract activity across the Navy and other branches. While specific new Navy housing and ship repair contracts from early July 2025 were not detailed in widely available public releases, recent trends show continuous substantial investment in sustainment, engineering services, and infrastructure across the armed forces. For instance, Global Pacific Design Builders was recently awarded a $297.1 million contract by NAVFAC Pacific for housing at Andersen Air Force Base in Guam, and CFM International secured a potential $2.8 billion contract from the Defense Logistics Agency for F108 engine supplies for the U.S. Air Force and Navy.

Shifting Policy and Strategic Directions:

Policy adjustments are also making headlines. The Trump administration has resumed some weapons shipments to Ukraine, including 155mm munitions and precision-guided rockets, following a brief and somewhat controversial pause initiated by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to assess U.S. stockpiles. This reversal highlights the ongoing complexities of international military aid and supply chain management in times of conflict.

In a move to modernize defense acquisition, Defense Secretary Hegseth is advocating for extensive reforms in the Pentagon's drone-buying practices. A recent memo, titled "Unleashing U.S. Military Drone Dominance," directs military services to establish active-duty experimental formations by September specifically to scale the use of drones across the Department of Defense. This signals a concerted effort to integrate autonomous capabilities more deeply into military operations, with a strong preference for domestically produced drones.

Internationally, there's growing discussion around European defense capabilities, with France and the UK reportedly taking steps towards a European nuclear deterrent, a significant development in continental security strategy, marked by a declaration that their deterrents, while independent, can be coordinated.

Industry Challenges and Trends:

The defense industry continues to grapple with various challenges. Reports indicate new aircraft carriers are facing years of delivery delays, with the USS John F. Kennedy (CVN-79) now expected in March 2027 instead of July 2025, and USS Enterprise (CVN-80) delayed to July 2030. These postponements are attributed to issues with advanced technologies and supply chain performance. DARPA has also ended its "Liberty Lifter" cargo seaplane program in June 2025, though it noted that further work is needed to bridge gaps between aviation and maritime regulatory frameworks for such designs, suggesting continued interest in the technology.

There's also concern from former Air Force chiefs regarding planned cuts to F-35 and E-7 programs, which could impact future air superiority. Over a dozen retired generals, including former chiefs of staff, urged Congress to reverse these Pentagon plans, citing national security concerns amid global tensions. Furthermore, tensions are reportedly simmering among partners in the Future Combat Air System (FCAS) program, particularly due to French demands for a greater say and Germany's subsequent consideration of purchasing more F-35s. Meanwhile, Denmark is moving to rapidly rebuild its missile shield and plans to rent air defenses as a short-term solution while also ordering more F-35s to strengthen its NATO commitments.

Supply chain resilience remains a critical focus. The Department of Defense's Manufacturing Technology Program (ManTech) is actively working to bolster the U.S. military industrial base by accelerating the development and application of advanced manufacturing technologies. This initiative aims to reduce costs and production times for critical defense systems, directly addressing vulnerabilities in the supply chain. Recent M&A activity in Q1 2025 also shows continued strength, with strategic buyers focusing on capability building and vertical integration, indicating ongoing consolidation to enhance technological prowess and supply chain control. Cybersecurity also remains a paramount concern, with increasing focus on bolstering network security and modernizing encryption.

---

In-Depth Summary: How Companies Should Respond

The current defense business environment, characterized by significant policy shifts, technological advancements, and persistent supply chain vulnerabilities, demands a proactive and adaptable response from defense contractors. Companies that thrive will be those that strategically navigate these complexities, focusing on innovation, compliance, and resilient operations.

1. Embrace and Drive Technological Innovation:

The push for advanced manufacturing, drones, and autonomous systems isn't just a fleeting trend; it's the future of defense. Companies must invest heavily in research and development (R&D) to stay at the forefront of emerging technologies like AI, robotics, and quantum computing. This isn't just about building new products, but also about integrating these technologies into existing systems for improved efficiency and capability.

• Strategic Partnerships: Collaborate with academic institutions, government laboratories (like DARPA), and even non-traditional defense firms. The significant grant to Anduril, a relatively newer player in defense, underscores the government's interest in leveraging commercial innovation.

• Agile Development: Adopt agile methodologies for product development and project management. This allows for rapid prototyping and iteration, crucial for meeting fast-evolving military requirements and adapting to unforeseen challenges, especially in areas like drone development, where the Pentagon is seeking rapid deployment.

• Leverage Data: Utilize big data and predictive analytics not only for product development but also for optimizing internal operations and anticipating market needs.

2. Prioritize Supply Chain Resilience and Diversification:

Recent events, from global pandemics to geopolitical tensions and even internal policy decisions like the temporary pause in Ukraine shipments, have starkly highlighted supply chain fragilities. Defense contractors must move beyond cost-cutting as the sole driver and prioritize robustness and security.

• Multi-Tier Visibility: Gain deep visibility into the entire supply chain, extending beyond Tier 1 suppliers to understand the origins and risks associated with lower-tier components and raw materials. This is crucial for compliance with initiatives like the ManTech program and NDAA mandates.

• Domestic Sourcing and Near-shoring: Actively seek opportunities to increase domestic sourcing for critical materials and components, especially those with high reliance on foreign adversaries. While this may incur initial costs, the long-term benefit of reduced vulnerability and enhanced national security is significant, aligning with the "Buy American" push for drones.

• Strategic Stockpiling: Work with government agencies to identify and strategically stockpile critical components and materials to mitigate the impact of sudden disruptions, as seen with the recent Ukraine weapons pause.

• Risk Management Frameworks: Implement comprehensive supply chain risk management frameworks that identify, assess, and mitigate risks from various sources, including geopolitical, macroeconomic, cyberattacks, and natural disasters. Predictive analytics can be invaluable here.

3. Navigate the Evolving Regulatory and Policy Landscape:

The defense contracting environment is highly regulated, and policy shifts can significantly impact business operations. Companies must maintain meticulous compliance and proactively engage with policy discussions.

• Enhanced Compliance Systems: Invest in robust compliance management systems that track changes in regulations (like DFARS), automate compliance processes, and minimize human error.

• Cybersecurity Fortification: With increased scrutiny on cybersecurity, companies must go beyond basic compliance. This includes rigorous assessments, certifications, and continuous monitoring to protect sensitive information and intellectual property throughout the supply chain, especially as more defense systems become digitally integrated.

• Understanding New Administration Priorities: A new administration, as seen with Defense Secretary Hegseth's focus on audits and drone reforms, can bring shifts in priorities. Companies should actively monitor these changes and prepare for increased scrutiny on spending, efficiency, and specific technological advancements.

• Adapt to Acquisition Reforms: The DoD is pushing for more agile and flexible contracting models, as well as efforts to reduce barriers for non-traditional contractors. Companies should understand and adapt to these new contracting mechanisms and demonstrate how they can deliver solutions more quickly and efficiently.

4. Foster Workforce Development and Talent Acquisition:

The demand for skilled labor in advanced manufacturing, cybersecurity, and emerging technologies is growing exponentially within the defense sector. Companies must strategically invest in their human capital to maintain a competitive edge and support national security objectives. This involves not only upskilling the current workforce but also aggressively attracting new talent from diverse pipelines.

Skill Development Programs: Implement robust internal training and development programs to upskill the existing workforce in critical areas like advanced manufacturing techniques, artificial intelligence (AI) literacy, advanced robotics, digital engineering, and cybersecurity. These programs should be agile, adapting to evolving technological needs and Department of Defense (DoD) priorities. Certification programs, specialized workshops, and internal academies can be effective models.

Attract New Talent: Develop comprehensive strategies to attract diverse talent, including from non-traditional backgrounds, to fill critical roles in a highly competitive labor market. This may involve:

• Collaborations with Educational Institutions: Partner closely with universities, community colleges, and vocational schools to develop curricula aligned with defense industry needs, offer internships, co-op programs, and scholarships. This includes supporting STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) programs from K-12 through higher education.

• Apprenticeships and Registered Apprenticeship Programs: Establish or participate in registered apprenticeship programs that provide structured on-the-job training combined with related technical instruction, creating clear pathways to skilled positions without necessarily requiring a four-year degree.

• Targeted Outreach: Engage with veterans, military spouses (e.g., through programs like MyCAA), and underrepresented groups to tap into diverse talent pools. Highlight the unique mission and impact of working in defense to attract individuals seeking purpose-driven careers.

• Modern Work Environment: Showcase modern manufacturing facilities and advanced technology to make defense careers attractive, emphasizing innovation and cutting-edge work environments.

Gaining Funding and Appropriations for Workforce Development:

Securing funding for these initiatives is paramount. Defense companies and their partners should strategically pursue various avenues:

• DoD Grant Programs:

  • National Defense Education Program (NDEP) Grants: The DoD regularly awards grants under NDEP, including the Manufacturing Engineering Education Program (MEEP) and STEM scholarship programs. These grants aim to establish or enhance programs that prepare the workforce for military systems and components.

  • Defense Manufacturing Community Support Program (DMCSP): This program provides grants to consortia designated as Defense Manufacturing Communities, making long-term investments in critical skills, facilities, workforce development, and small business support to strengthen the national security innovation base. Companies should actively participate in or form such consortia.

  • Manufacturing USA Institutes: Engage with DoD-sponsored Manufacturing USA Institutes (e.g., Advanced Functional Fabrics of America Institute (AFFOA), Advanced Regenerative Manufacturing Institute (ARMI), Advanced Robotics for Manufacturing (ARM) Institute). These institutes often have a mandate for workforce development and provide funding opportunities or collaborative projects.

  • Broad Agency Announcements (BAAs): Monitor DoD agencies like DARPA, Army Research Laboratory (ARL), and others for BAAs that solicit proposals for research and development, often including a workforce development component for emerging technologies.

• Department of Labor (DOL) Grants:

  • Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Funds: Collaborate with state and local workforce development boards to access WIOA funds, which support job training, public employment services, and grant programs for targeted populations.

  • State Apprenticeship Expansion Formula (SAEF) Grants: Leverage these grants to expand registered apprenticeship programs, which are crucial for developing skilled trades.

• Congressional Appropriations:

  • Direct Advocacy: Companies and industry associations should directly advocate to Congress for increased appropriations for defense workforce development initiatives. This involves demonstrating the critical need for skilled labor to maintain military superiority and the economic benefits of such investments.

  • National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA): Influence the NDAA process to include provisions that mandate or increase funding for specific workforce development programs, emphasizing areas like industrial base resilience, acquisition workforce modernization (e.g., Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund - DAWDF), and critical technology skills.

• Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs):

  • Collaborative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs) and Educational Partnership Agreements (EPAs): Utilize these agreements with federal laboratories and universities to share resources, conduct joint research, and enhance STEM education and workforce training relevant to defense needs.

  • Industry Consortia: Form or join industry consortia that collectively apply for grants, share best practices, and pool resources for common workforce challenges. This collaborative approach can often secure larger funding opportunities.

• Internal and Private Investment:

  • Dedicated Corporate Budgets: Allocate internal funds specifically for talent development, recognizing it as a strategic investment rather than just an overhead cost.

  • Venture Capital and Strategic Capital: For companies focused on cutting-edge technologies, attracting private capital from venture capitalists or through new DoD offices like the Office of Strategic Capital can fund the rapid scaling of talent needed for novel capabilities.

By strategically focusing on these areas for workforce development and talent acquisition, and actively pursuing diverse funding and appropriation avenues, defense companies can not only adapt to the current dynamics but also position themselves for sustained growth and contribute effectively to national security in an increasingly complex global environment.

---

References

• Associated Press. (2025, July 8). Trump caught off guard by Pentagon's abrupt move to pause Ukraine weapons deliveries, AP sources say. https://apnews.com/article/trump-ukraine-weapons-pentagon-15694071ddb6f7040273e9ef090e84c4

• Associated Press. (2025, July 9). Ohio awards $310 million to US defense contractor for 4,000-worker advanced manufacturing facility. https://www.10tv.com/article/news/local/boomtown-ohio/ohio-awards-310-million-to-anduril-industries-for-advanced-manufacturing-facility/530-e4eb7b71-df72-4144-a8db-05ad5b685c3f

• Defense Industry Europe. (2025, July 8). Delivery of USS John F. Kennedy delayed Until 2027, cutting U.S. Navy's aircraft carrier fleet to ten. https://defence-industry.eu/delivery-of-uss-john-f-kennedy-delayed-until-2027-cutting-u-s-navys-aircraft-carrier-fleet-to-ten/

• Defense Industry Europe. (2025, July 11). Germany plans to buy 15 more F-35 fighter jets amid tensions with France over FCAS project. https://defence-industry.eu/germany-plans-to-buy-15-more-f-35-fighter-jets-amid-tensions-with-france-over-fcas-project/

• Defense News. (2025, July 8). Denmark to rent air defenses as it rushes to rebuild missile shield. https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2025/07/08/denmark-to-rent-air-defenses-as-it-ruses-to-rebuild-missile-shield/

• Defense News. (2025, July 8). Former Air Force chiefs sound alarm about planned F-35, E-7 cuts. https://www.defensenews.com/air/2025/07/08/former-air-force-chiefs-sound-alarm-about-planned-f-35-e-7-cuts/

• Defense News. (2025, July 10). Hegseth calls for extensive reforms to Pentagon drone-buying practices. https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2025/07/10/hegseth-calls-for-extensive-reforms-to-pentagon-drone-buying-practices/

• Defense.gov. (2025, July 8). DOD ManTech Program Grows U.S. Military Industrial Base. https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/4237357/dod-mantech-program-grows-us-military-industrial-base/

• GovCon Wire. (2025, July 8). CFM Secures Potential $2.8B DLA Contract for F108 Engine Supplies. https://www.govconwire.com/articles/cfm-secures-potential-2-8b-dla-contract-for-f108-engine-supplies/

• GovCon Wire. (2025, July 9). Global Pacific Design Builders Lands $297M NAVFAC Pacific Contract for Andersen AFB Housing Project. https://www.govconwire.com/articles/global-pacific-design-builders-navfac-pacific-andersen-afb-housing-contract/

• Hansard (UK Parliament). (2025, July 10). UK-France Nuclear Partnership. https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2025-07-10/debates/A1B875BF-41C3-40B4-B5C6-07D0639C97B0/UK-FranceNuclearPartnership

• KPMG. (2025, July 10). Emerging trends in aerospace and defense 2025. https://kpmg.com/us/en/articles/2025/emerging-trends-aerospace-defense.html

• Meridian Capital. (2025, April 11). Aerospace, Defense & Space Q1, 2025 M&A Market Update. https://meridianib.com/aerospace-defense-space-q1-2025-ma-market-update/

• The Aviationist. (2025, July 11). Liberty Lifter Ekranoplan Transport Program Scrapped by DARPA. https://theaviationist.com/2025/07/11/liberty-lifter-ekranoplan-cancelled/